Wednesday, January 29, 2020

Pre-1914 literature Arthur Conan Doyle Essay Example for Free

Pre-1914 literature Arthur Conan Doyle Essay The previous pair of quotes significantly carries the Victorian assumption of evil and mysterious foreigners. Victorians associated drugs with the Far East: As I entered, a swallow of Malay attendant, and the rascally Lascar who runs it has sworn to have vengeance upon me. Both these quotes suggest similar nature in the Victorian attitude to others of different origins. The drugs and alcohol is unfairly associated with Malaysia being a Far Eastern country, this unfairly creates unnecessary judgements about the atmosphere of the country. Lascar was a Victorian term used to label an East Indian (Pakistani) sailor army servant. The Lascar in The Man with the Twisted Lip was described as rascally Lascar, although this indicates that the den runner is Asian but also the description creates an image of a mischievous person. We have seen how Arthur Conan Doyle has used stereotypical thoughts in his work to satisfy the aristocracy. The Victorians feared that the culture and customs of non British people, they felt threatened by foreigners; Sherlock Holmes was a method of reassurance in which the Victorian culture and values were still respected. During the Victorian era there were three sets of class between people. The highest class were called the Aristocracy, the middle class were called the Merchants, and the lowest class were known as the poor. The aristocracy lived a life of luxury and had huge amounts of materialistic wealth and possessions. The aristocracy were all educated and had a high status amongst all people. The merchants could have possibly been literate, but they were not as highly renowned compared to the aristocracy, but they were better off compared to the poor. The merchant class would do a certain job for a living. Lastly, the poor were very uneducated and lived in awful conditions. They were detested by the aristocracy because of their lack of hygiene and also because of their class. The aristocracy at the time of the Victorian era were seen as the most intelligent, in The Speckled Band we are clearly shown that Holmes is of the upper class: Very soon to knock you up Watson; he uses upper class speech. Holmes in The Speckled Band also shows his intelligence No, but I observe the second half of a return ticket; this quote shows the wise and intelligent remarks Holmes uses. The upper class were also shown to be very respective and polite, in A study in Scarlet, Holmes shows his upper class etiquettes: His eyes fairly glittered as he spoke, and he put his hand over his heart and bowed, as it to some applauding crowd conjured up by his imagination. The upper class would help and always relate to each other, in The Noble Batchelor: I presume they were hardly from the same class of society, No I am descending, My last client of the sort was a king. Holmes tells a client that he has worked for a King. In another Sherlock Holmes novel The Adventure of Black Peter: he frequently refused his help to the powerful and wealthy where the problem made no appeal to his sympathies. These quotes show how Holmes who is of the upper class helps the upper class only if the problem is actualy a valid one for him to have nay interest in. In the customs of Victorian culture Victorian gentlemen were intelligent and rational thinkers and also family leaders and role models. If a man of the upper class fails to acquire these fundamental aspects of a well character gentleman they would be known as a fallen gentleman. In The Speckled Band Dr Roylott is a perfect example of a fallen gentleman: he beat his native butler to death and narrowly escaped a capital sentence, he shut himself up in his house and seldom came out save to indulge in ferocious quarrels with whoever might cross his path. Violence of temper approaching to mania. Dr Roylott is a fallen gentleman, some aspects which make him one is that he is a murderer and has a violent nature. Another perfect example of a fallen gentleman can be found in The Man with the Twisted Lip, the character Mr St. Clair displays clear characteristics of a fallen gentleman: to my relief, that instead of being identified as Mr Neville St. Clair, I was arrested as his murderer. Mr St. Clair has been caught acting as a beggar to earn money when he seemed to be a of the higher class standards. Doing such things was an obvious big offence to the Victorian customs. The aristocracy thought of themselves as supreme and pure, they never did any physical work that could discolour their skin: a pale face (From The Man with the Twisted Lip). The aristocracy tend to have very pale skin, indicating that they do not work, because work can causes skin discolouring. Hygiene was a very important aspect of everyday aristocracy life, in The Speckled Band, it is very unusual that Holmes packs a toothbrush when he is off to investigate an incident: That and a toothbrush are, I think, all that we need. As well as hygiene, appearance was obviously a very important item addressed in everyday upper class life. From The Man with the Twisted Lip we are shown: such as he had started to town in, he has on neither collar nor necktie. This quote reveals to us how important this was to the upper class. This is demonstrating that a man of high class would never be seen without a tie around his neck. The merchant class were not as intelligent and as respected as the aristocracy. The middleclass were not better than the upper class. As justified by the following quote from The Scandal in Bohemia, it displays a very basic outline in what Holmes does: he was still, as ever, deeply attracted by the study of crime, and occupied his immense faculties and extraordinary powers of observation in following out those clues and clearing up these mysteries, which had been abandoned as hopeless by the official police. Not only does this quote demonstrate the powers and qualities of Holmes, but in meaning it also shows us that the police who are the working class are being outsmarted by Holmes who is of the upper class, which suggests that the upper class is better than the merchant or working class. The aristocracy also control the middleclass: if you leave it to a court of law to clear the matter up on the other hand, if you convince the police authorities that there is no possible case against you (From The Man with the Twisted Lip). This quote shows us the Victorian thinking that a person belonging to the aristocracy will always have power and manipulation over the lower classes. The poor were hated by the upper classes. The higher class hated them for many reasons, one being there appearance, and extract from The Man with the Twisted Lip: He was, as the inspector said extremely dirty, but the grime which covered his face could not conceal its repulsive ugliness. This reveals that the Victorian upper class thought the poor as being very ugly, disgusting and dirty, this was the stereotype that all poor people were ugly and dirty. The lower class were seen as the worst of all people; the gypsies were hated just because they lived in a different way. In The Speckled Band, the Ms Stoner states: sometimes it may have referred to some band of people, perhaps to these very gypsies in the plantation might have suggested the strange adjective she used. This demonstrated the class differences, Ms Stoner feels superior to the gypsies, also revealing that the Victorian aristocracy though themselves as being superior to all other classes. Victorian assumption to crime mysteries is that if there was a person out of the upper class or the poor they were the criminals. From The Man with the Twisted Lip, this attitude is clearly shown: wash his hands, and his face is as black as a tinkers. Well once his case is settled he will have a regular prison bath. This quotes significance is that the poor people were always the assumed of committing crimes, because that is the only way they can survive. When someone decides to change their class it is seen as the worst possible thing that could happen in the view of Victorians. The poor cannot be changed to the aristocracy because of their past and their low status. The same way a man of the aristocracy cannot become lower than his usual class, if this does happen then this is seen as the most shameful situation. Prime examples are Dr Roylott from The Speckled Band and Mr St. Clair from The Man with the Twisted Lip. From analysing mainly the two novels; The Speckled Band and The Man with the Twisted Lip that were both written by Arthur Conan Doyle, the Victorian attitudes towards gender, ethnicity and class are revealed. In terms of gender these points have been discussed and proven; Men were fare more intelligent and rational than women. Women were over emotional; they also had authority over domestic matters. However, men were in control over all aspects of Victorian life. Points concerning ethnicity were; Victorians felt threatened and also hated foreigners (Xenophobia). Victorian saw foreigners and animals as dangerous and mischievous. Victorian towards class was that the Aristocracy were very wealthy, the working class worked for their wealth and the lower class was just poor. Someone transferring classes was not acceptable in Victorian society, the Victorians held a strong belief that someone should stick to their status and class. From the previous Victorian assumption we can conclude that the Victorian morals, values and thinking were much contrasting than what the present views on society are, and things have changed in a positive way.   Show preview only The above preview is unformatted text This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Conan Doyle section.

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Affordable Health Care: A Review of the 2010 HealthCare Reform Bill Es

After months of substantial and aggressive deliberation around the United States, particularly in Washington, the HealthCare Reform of 2010 also known as the Affordable Care Act, was passed with a filibuster favorable to Democrats and signed into office on March 23rd by President Barrack Obama. Though it is intricately detailed, the ideal purposes as promised by those who promoted it are to provide inexpensive and uncomplicated health insurance to citizens along with enhanced coverage for those with pre-existing conditions, beneficial prescription drug provisions and changes to tax credits. Essentially, the law incorporates the positive aspects of today’s health care system and repairs the areas due for improvements. Over the first ten years of its enforcement in office, this reform is intended to expand coverage to over 32 million Americans who are currently uninsured and estimates a 130 billion dollar reduction in nationwide deficit. Each provision of the law was proposed to occur over a four year period with some of its ten titles such as the FDA’s authorization to approve generic versions of certain drugs ensuing immediately while others including the expansion of Medicaid eligibility for the poverty stricken taking effect in early 2014. Many are concerned it is futile and will only further damage a fragile American economy but to many the introduction of the Affordable Care Act is perfectly timed to mend a broken health system in a struggling society. Conceivably the industry most affected by the passage of the bill is insurance agencies. As of September 23rd 2010, according to the government’s website, whitehouse.gov, all insurers are required to pay the entire fees of advised precautionary medical services such as mammogra... ...g News Headlines: Business, Entertainment & World News - CBS News. 23 Mar. 2010. Web. 11 Apr. 2011. . 2. "Preventive Care under the Affordable Care Act | HealthCare.gov." Home | HealthCare.gov. 23 Sept. 2010. Web. 13 Apr. 2011. . 3. "Top 10 Pros & Cons - Health Care Reform - ProCon.org." Health Care Reform ProCon.org. 01 Sept. 2010. Web. 13 Apr. 2011. . 4. "Health Bill a Milestone -- or a Mistake? - CNN.com." CNN.com - Breaking News, U.S., World, Weather, Entertainment & Video News. 22 Mar. 2010. Web. 13 Apr. 2011. .

Monday, January 13, 2020

Ariel Levys Essay

There is no doubt about it that sex sells. In today’s world it is impossible to turn on the television without seeing a sexual-based commercial playing. Raunch culture is known as a sexualized lifestyle. Many businesses, advertisements, movies, and people partake in this lifestyle choice every day. Ariel Levy’s is a staff writer at The New Yorker magazine and author of the book Female Chauvinist Pigs she has appeared in big name magazines such as Vogue and the New York Times. Ariel Levy’s standpoint in â€Å"Female Chauvinist Pigs† is that raunch culture empowers women. I have mixed feelings about this article. I disagree that raunch culture empowers women however I agree there is just a certain way you have to do it. In reading Levy’s article she discusses raunch culture and how women feel empowered by it. Women feel like being sexy or sexually stimulating men makes them feel more in control. Levy gives a different outlook on the women that partake in this lifestyle. Levy feels that women are close-minded when discussing sexual things. Levy gives an inside look on certain women that partake in this industry by showing that its way more than just â€Å"sex†. Ruanch culture makes women look worthless and gives off the impression that they don’t have any self-respect. We are looked at as just a â€Å"sexual object† rather than a respected woman. Ruach culture suppresses us as women and we are getting nowhere as women with these kind of vulgar activity’s. Women today are still being looked at as weaker than men. I have googled multiple porn stars of today such as Pinky, Jenna Jameson, and many others; they all seem to have one thing in common. These women don’t have husbands, children, and they don’t get along with their family. I know from a personal experience with having brothers that they would never take a stripper or a porn-star home to my mother. It might be cool to sleep with them but at the  end of the day a man wants a woman that is respectable and classy, basically someone they can actually take home there to mom. My mother always says â€Å"if you don’t have respect for yourself, how are you going to have respect for others†. Ruanch culture also objectifies women instead of empowering them. I did some research and found a biography on Jenna Jameson, a world known porn-star, on YouTube. She talked about her life, family, community service that she has done. Although she spoke on all those positive things people’s comments were still derogatory, calling her a â€Å"hoe† and a â€Å"slut†. Even though she has done many things in the community she is still looked upon as nothing more than a porn-star. This is what I meant by saying that ruanch does not empower women. This woman can give thousands to charity’s do numerous community activities help people all around the world but her erotic lifestyle will never get her the respect she deserves. If anyone has ever watched the HBO show called â€Å"Sex in The City† raunchy culture is the whole makeup of the show. Basically the show is about four ladies that are the best of friends they go to parties and they speak about their sexual experiences love interests and careers. The main character Carrey Bradshaw is a sex column writer for the New York Times. She gives women advice on how to deal with sex and relationships. This to me walks a fine line with raunchiness. In the show people are so glad that she writes these columns, she helps out regular women with awkward situations such as sex. This is a different form of raunchiness and I actually accept it. Carrey helps women get through difficult times with the different men in their life. A lot of times women don’t know what to do in certain situations and feel embarrassed about asking someone for advice that is where she comes in to help with her column. She is not showing her breast or objectifying her, she is only just giving advice on the topic of sex still raunchy but in the way that she is writing, it comes off respectable. As women we should come together and stop objectifying ourselves. I feel that porn should be banded on the fact that as women it’s getting us nowhere. People are only looking at us as these sexual objects rather than  smart sophisticated human beings that we actually are. Porn is a disgrace for all women. It makes us look bad as women, like as if there is nothing more to us than a nice butt and a perky set of boobs. Levy’s argument that raunch empowers women is only good up to a certain extent. If you have to put yourself out there to get attention our show your body then that is not empowerment.There are many other ways that woman can empower themselves such as fighting for positive/worthy causes, mentoring to young ladies, and volunteering services for young woman. If woman today focus on more of these positive aspects of empowerment then there will be no need to take off your clothes to fill liberated. These kind of empowering activities will give us the respect we deserve as woman. Outline i. There’s no doubt about it that sex sells a. Sex doesn’t empower women b. It is occurring every day in today’s society commercials, movies, people etc. c. It is affecting young women d. We have to start respecting ourselves more as women so we can get to get on the same level as a man ii. Author Ariel levy believes that raunch culture empowers women a. Levy feels that raunch is a form of empowerment for some women b. I agree and disagree that raunch empowers women iii. Levy feels that as women we are closed-minded about talking about sex we should open our minds to different things and how ruanch empowers women and makes them feel in control or dominate over a man. iv. I believe that raunchiness suppresses women a. Levy feels that raunch empowers women b. She talks about strippers and â€Å"how they could teach you a thing or two† quoted by Levy pg.267 c. I believe that levy is wrong it doesn’t help us as women to achieve equality with men they look at us as sexual objects rather than human beings. Summary In ‘Female Chauvinist Pigs† author Ariel levy speaks on how raunchiness empowers women and makes them feel more in control. She gives an inside look on the woman who partake in this lifestyle. I believe it doesn’t empower women but actually suppresses us as women. Men look at us as only â€Å"sexual objects† rather than sophisticated human beings. As women I feel we should have a lot more respect for ourselves. I believe there are only a few exceptions to raunchiness for example journalism or advice columns or a sex doctor other than that it is simply wrong. As a woman I feel we need to get rid of porn, it’s getting us nowhere as women. We are not on the same playing field as man and I believe that porn is preventing it from happening. If we could come together as women and start respecting ourselves more I feel a lot can change in the future. K.A.N Knowledge 1. My audience knows about sex and the role it plays in everyday life 2. Raunchiness is suppressing women because we are not equal to man 3. The reason its suppressing women is because we will never be able to be equal to a man if this doesn’t stop Attitude 1. This is a serious essay so serious would be the attitude I’m going for 2. I want them to take this essay seriously because it’s a serious matter Needs 1. The reader to understand the seriousness of the topic 2. For women to have more self-respect 3. Abolish porn to help women get on the same playing field as men 4. To come together to make this all happen

Sunday, January 5, 2020

World War II Admiral Marc A. Mitscher

Born in Hillsboro, WI on January 26, 1887, Marc Andrew Mitscher was the son of Oscar and Myrta Mitscher. Two years later, the family moved to Oklahoma where they settled in the new town of Oklahoma City. Prominent in the community, Mitschers father served as Oklahoma Citys second mayor between 1892 and 1894. In 1900, President William McKinley appointed the elder Mitscher to serve as the Indian Agent in Pawhuska, OK. Unhappy with the local educational system, he sent his son east to Washington, DC to attend grade and high schools. Graduating, Mitscher received an appointment to the US Naval Academy with the aid of Representative Bird S. McGuire. Entering Annapolis in 1904, he proved a dismal student and had difficulty staying out of trouble. Amassing 159 demerits and possessing poor grades, Mitscher received a forced resignation in 1906. With the assistance of McGuire, Mitschers father was able to obtain a second appointment for his son later that year. Re-entering Annapolis as a plebe, Mitschers performance improved. Dubbed Oklahoma Pete in reference to the territorys first midshipman (Peter C.M. Cade) who had washed out in 1903, the nickname stuck and Mitscher became known as Pete. Remaining a marginal student, he graduated in 1901 ranked 113th in a class of 131. Leaving the academy, Mitscher commenced two years at sea aboard the battleship USS Colorado which operated with the US Pacific Fleet. Completing his sea time, he was commissioned as an ensign on March 7, 1912. Remaining in the Pacific, he moved through several short postings before arriving aboard USS California (renamed USS San Diego in 1914) in August 1913. While aboard, he took part in the 1914 Mexican Campaign. Taking Flight Interested in flying from the start of his career, Mitscher attempted to transfer to aviation while still serving on Colorado. Subsequent requests were also denied and he remained in surface warfare. In 1915, after duty aboard the destroyers USS Whipple and USS Stewart, Mitscher had his request granted and received orders to report to Naval Aeronautical Station, Pensacola for training. This was soon followed by an assignment to the cruiser USS North Carolina which carried an aircraft catapult on its fantail. Completing his training, Mitscher received his wings on June 2, 1916, as Naval Aviator No. 33. Returning to Pensacola for additional instruction, he was there when the United States entered World War I in April 1917. Ordered to USS Huntington later in the year, Mitscher conducted catapult experiments and took part in convoy duty. The following year saw Mitscher serve at Naval Air Station, Montauk Point before taking command of Naval Air Station, Rockaway and Naval Air Station, Miami. Relieved in February 1919, he reported for duty with the Aviation Section in the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. In May, Mitscher took part in the first trans-Atlantic flight which saw three US Navy seaplanes (NC-1, NC-3, and NC-4) attempt to fly from Newfoundland to England via the Azores and Spain. Piloting NC-1, Mitscher encountered heavy fog and landed near the Azores to determine his position. This action was followed by NC-3. Touching down, neither aircraft was able to take off again due to poor sea conditions. Despite this setback, NC-4 successfully completed the flight to England. For his role in the mission, Mitscher received the Navy Cross. Interwar Years Returning to sea later in 1919, Mitscher reported aboard USS Aroostook which served as flagship of the US Pacific Fleets air detachment. Moving through posts on the West Coast, he returned east in 1922 to command Naval Air Station, Anacostia. Shifting to a staff assignment a short time later, Mitscher remained in Washington until 1926 when was ordered to join the US Navys first aircraft carrier, USS Langley (CV-1). Later that year, he received orders to aid in the fitting out of USS Saratoga (CV-3) at Camden, NJ. He remained with Saratoga through the ships commissioning and first two years of operation. Appointed executive officer of Langley in 1929, Mitscher only stayed with the ship six months before commencing four years of staff assignments. In June 1934, he returned to Saratoga as the executive officer before later commanding USS Wright and Patrol Wing One. Promoted to captain in 1938, Mitscher began overseeing the fitting out of USS Hornet (CV-8) in 1941. When the ship entered service that October, he assumed command and commenced training operations from Norfolk, VA. Doolittle Raid With the American entry into World War II that December following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Hornet intensified its training in preparation for combat operations. During this time, Mitscher was consulted regarding the feasibility of launching B-25 Mitchell medium bombers from the carriers flight deck. Replying that he believed it was possible, Mitscher was proved right following tests in February 1942. On March 4, Hornet departed Norfolk with orders to sail for San Francisco, CA. Transiting the Panama Canal, the carrier arrived at Naval Air Station, Alameda on March 20. While there, sixteen US Army Air Forces B-25s were loaded onto Hornets flight deck. Receiving sealed orders, Mitscher put to sea on April 2 before informing the crew that the bombers, led by Lieutenant Colonel Jimmie Doolittle, were intended for a strike on Japan and would hit their targets before flying on to China. Steaming across the Pacific, Hornet rendezvoused with Vice Admiral William Halseys Task Forc e 16 and advanced on Japan. Spotted by a Japanese picket boat on April 18, Mitscher and Doolittle met and decided to begin the attack despite being 170 miles short of the intended launch point. After Doolittles planes roared off Hornets deck, Mitscher immediately turned and raced back to Pearl Harbor. Battle of Midway After pausing in Hawaii, Mitscher and Hornet moved south with the goal of reinforcing Allied forces prior to the Battle of the Coral Sea. Failing to arrive in time, the carrier returned to Pearl Harbor before being dispatched to defend Midway as part of Rear Admiral Raymond Spruances Task Force 17. On May 30, Mitscher received a promotion to rear admiral (retroactive to December 4, 1941). In the opening days of June, he took part in the pivotal Battle of Midway which saw American forces sink four Japanese carriers. In the course of the fighting, Hornets air group performed poorly with its dive bombers failing to locate the enemy and its torpedo squadron being lost in its entirety. This shortcoming greatly bothered Mitscher as he felt that his ship had not pulled its weight. Departing Hornet in July, he took command of Patrol Wing 2 before receiving an assignment in the South Pacific as Commander Fleet Air, Noumà ©a in December. In April 1943, Halsey moved Mitscher to Guadalcanal to serve as Commander Air, Solomon Islands. In this role, he earned the Distinguished Service Medal for leading Allied aircraft against Japanese forces in the island chain. Fast Carrier Task Force Leaving the Solomons in August, Mitscher returned to the United States and spent the fall overseeing Fleet Air on the West Coast. Well-rested, he resumed combat operations in January 1944 when he took command of Carrier Division 3. Flying his flag from USS Lexington (CV-16), Mitscher supported Allied amphibious operations in the Marshall Islands, including Kwajalein, before mounting a hugely successful series of strikes against the Japanese fleet anchorage at Truk in February. These efforts led to him being awarded a gold star in lieu of a second Distinguished Service Medal. The following month, Mitscher was promoted to vice admiral and his command evolved into the Fast Carrier Task Force which alternated as Task Force 58 and Task Force 38 depending upon whether it was serving in Spruances Fifth Fleet or Halseys Third Fleet. In this command, Mitscher would earn two gold stars for his Navy Cross as well as a gold star in place of a third Distinguished Service Medal. In June, Mitschers carriers and aviators struck a decisive blow at the Battle of the Philippine Sea when they aided in sinking three Japanese carriers and decimated the enemys naval air arm. Launching a late attack on June 20, his aircraft were forced to return in the darkness. Concerned about his pilots safety, Mitscher ordered his carriers running lights turned on despite the risk of alerting enemy forces to their position. This decision allowed the bulk of the aircraft to be recovered and earned the admiral the thanks of his men. In September, Mitscher supported the campaign against Peleliu before moving against the Philippines. A month later, TF38 played a key role in the Battle of Leyte Gulf where it sank four enemy carriers. Following the victory, Mitscher rotated to a planning role and turned command over to Vice Admiral John McCain. Returning in January 1945, he led the American carriers during the campaigns against Iwo Jima and Okinawa as well as mounted a series of strikes against the Japanese home islands. Operating off Okinawa in April and May, Mitschers pilots worked the stem the threat posed by Japanese kamikazes. Rotating out in late May, he became Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Air in July. Mitscher was in this position when the war ended on September 2. Later Career With the end of the war, Mitscher remained in Washington until March 1946 when he assumed command of the Eighth Fleet. Relieved in September, he immediately took over as Commander-in-Chief, US Atlantic Fleet with the rank of admiral. A staunch advocate of naval aviation, he publically defended the US Navys carrier force against postwar defense cuts. In February 1947, Mitscher suffered a heart attack and was taken to the Norfolk Naval Hospital. He died there on February 3 from coronary thrombosis. Mitschers body was then transported to Arlington National Cemetery where he was buried with full military honors.